![]() |
Leicester Liberal Democrats |
Working for
YOU |
| 8th September 2010 | Leicester Liberal Democrats | <enquiries@leicester-libdems.org.uk> |
Parmjit Singh Gill MP Slams Council Tax Benefit For Being Too Complicated12.00.00am GMT Tue 13th Jan 2004 Commenting on the Government's Council Tax Benefit advertising campaign, Parmjit Singh Gill MP, Member of Parliament for Leicester South, said: "Pensioners are missing out on £750 million worth of Council Tax benefit. Another £250 million is not taken up by other qualifying claimants. "I welcome efforts to improve uptake, but after ten years of Council Tax it's pretty clear the benefit system is too complicated to work. "The way to make local tax fairer is to abolish Council Tax and replace it with a local income tax based on the ability to pay. "Local Income Tax has fairness built in - so there wouldn't be a need for a benefit system, let alone an expensive advertising campaign." ENDS Notes to Editors * Pensioners missing out on £750 million of benefits. <http://www.dss.gov.uk/mediacentre/pressreleases/2005/jan/ctb-campaign.asp>
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Wed 13th Jan 2010: Parmjit Singh-Gill puts fairness at the heart of the Liberal Democrat campaign. Tue 10th May 2005: Thank you from Parmjit Singh Gill. Fri 18th Mar 2005: Parmjit Singh Gill Launches Search For Local Heroes . Wed 22nd Dec 2004: Lib Dems Challenge Labour's Education Stealth Tax - Parmjit Singh Gill. Fri 10th Dec 2004: Parmjit Singh Gill MP tables motion in Parliament in support of new translation service. Wed 8th Dec 2004: Parmjit Singh Gill MP asks Health Minister to improve NHS dentist take up. Fri 22nd Oct 2004: Parmjit Singh Gill MP visits Sir Jonathan North Community College. Mon 28th Jun 2004: Parmjit Gill fights against Labour plans to close our local Post Offices. Wed 9th Jun 2004: Lib Dems choose Parmjit Singh Gill. Related Speeches:Tue 23rd Nov 2004: Published and promoted by Peter Coley on behalf of Leicester Liberal Democrats, all at 48 Westfield Road, Leicester. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |